The next president and vice president may be the most
important choices in the history of the U.S. Why would I say such a thing?
Look at the world. China and many third world countries
are "coming into their own" now. They compete for every
resource on the planet. I do not believe there are enough
resources to supply everyone. Food, water, and oil are the
primary commodities. Many countries have oil, they are low on
water. In many countries they do not have food or water and
the people are dying. That is not really new, but it has
increased exponentially over the last 30 years. China
owns/leases land all around the world that they grow rubber
and food on; they cut the timber and decimate the ecology.
The middle eastern countries are money mad because of the oil
that drives the world. They feel like they control the money.
We have politicians here that are only worried about keeping
their jobs and lining their pockets. The russians are
building up again. They failed the democratic route. In south america,
we have dictators and idiots espousing hatred for us, but they sell
us their products and take our donations. We give billions of dollars
to countries all over the world.
They spit at us and call us names, then tell us how bad we
are. Islamic terrorists think they can get into heaven by
killing us. I am pretty sure that there is no such thing as a
moderate muslim, but the apologizers say there is.
Hell, in Greece, they are threatening to vote the U.S. out of NATO
if we do not stop using the name America?! I always thought the Greeks were alies and reasonable. I guess they decided to get on the "bash America" bandwagon.
They take our money though. Screw them.
Oh yeah, must not forget iran. They say they are not trying to build nukes.
That is not something I believe and I do not trust any of them with nukes.
The United Nations is a joke. They believe they have a say in what happenes
in every country, even the U.S. They are corrupt and full of pompous
blowhards that should be removed from the country.
Our borders are open to anything. The government will not follow the
constitution. They will not protect the country. To them, the borders
are just another problem to talk about, not to resolve. There are so many
other problems going on also.
So why is this election so important? The next president will have
to be strong, completely for America, and capable of making tough fast
decisions. If the rest of the world does not like it, he/she will still have to
make those decisions. I believe in that in the next few years, we will be in a
major war, not for the sake of oil or the downtrodden, but for
the survival of the U.S. This president should be able to
order nuclear retaliation if need be without asking for votes
in congress or the opinions of his pollsters. Are you willing to leave that
choice to Obama or to Clinton? I sure hope not. Yeah, McCain is not the
perfect choice, but the country might survive with him. I wish we
had other choices, but we do not. One of these three will be answering
the phone at 3AM and we will be screwed if it is obama or clinton
Sunday, May 04, 2008
Presidential Choices
Each person is responsible for their actions and also for
what they say. Words have always been powerful. We are judged
and held accountable for what we say. If you are interviewed by the police and say something,
later on you better not change your story. Now we come to presidential candidates. When you are a candidate, everything about you is circumspect. Everything
you say and do is monitored and judged. It is the same for
your associations. The people you know, visit, listen to, or
follow are also included in this evaluation of your suitability.
It may not seem fair, but it is a part of the process and it
is necessary. In this day and age, we need to know as much
about presidential candidates as possible. What they believe,
what they SAY they will do, their attitudes, how their values
were shaped, and more. Enter "reverend wright. For 20 years, obama
has listened to this guy. Obama actually said that wright was his mentor.
So, it is clear that wright helped to form the Obama family ideals and opinions.
It cannot be denied, that is the way it
works. You can see the same type of influence with the cult members
in texas and the women and girls there. Brought up to believe
without thought.
If you need a clearance from the government to work, the FBI
will investigate your life with a comb. If there are problems
in your backround, you just might not get that job. So here we have
a new politician; he has ties to very radical friends. Idiots like his minister,
he has ties to farakhan, ( a very anti-white, anti-american guy) and he has
ties to Ayers.( That is the terrorist from the 70s that bombed
and killed a cop. He says he wish he could have done more.) There is also Rezco.
I cannot give obama the benefit of doubt. The reason I
cannot is because of the job he is trying to get. It is the
most important and powerful position on the planet. We may not
get the best person, but we sure do not need someone that has
been influenced by that minister, sharpton, ayers, or
farakhan. Can you see any of these guys in the White House
with the ear of the President?! I don't think so.
what they say. Words have always been powerful. We are judged
and held accountable for what we say. If you are interviewed by the police and say something,
later on you better not change your story. Now we come to presidential candidates. When you are a candidate, everything about you is circumspect. Everything
you say and do is monitored and judged. It is the same for
your associations. The people you know, visit, listen to, or
follow are also included in this evaluation of your suitability.
It may not seem fair, but it is a part of the process and it
is necessary. In this day and age, we need to know as much
about presidential candidates as possible. What they believe,
what they SAY they will do, their attitudes, how their values
were shaped, and more. Enter "reverend wright. For 20 years, obama
has listened to this guy. Obama actually said that wright was his mentor.
So, it is clear that wright helped to form the Obama family ideals and opinions.
It cannot be denied, that is the way it
works. You can see the same type of influence with the cult members
in texas and the women and girls there. Brought up to believe
without thought.
If you need a clearance from the government to work, the FBI
will investigate your life with a comb. If there are problems
in your backround, you just might not get that job. So here we have
a new politician; he has ties to very radical friends. Idiots like his minister,
he has ties to farakhan, ( a very anti-white, anti-american guy) and he has
ties to Ayers.( That is the terrorist from the 70s that bombed
and killed a cop. He says he wish he could have done more.) There is also Rezco.
I cannot give obama the benefit of doubt. The reason I
cannot is because of the job he is trying to get. It is the
most important and powerful position on the planet. We may not
get the best person, but we sure do not need someone that has
been influenced by that minister, sharpton, ayers, or
farakhan. Can you see any of these guys in the White House
with the ear of the President?! I don't think so.
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Peoples Rights
I admit that I have not watched this as closely as some people, but I do know that they do not have any guilty people there, not yet. Also, I have not seen anyone discuss it from this angle at all in the blogs or news.
Now, I believe that if any of them forced young girls into sex and marriage, they should be drug out in the streeet and shot. However, all I know is that they said a 16 year old girl called asking for help, saying these things. Maybe that is true, but they have not found the girl yet have they? In fact, they used this call to justify raiding the place of this sect and taking all the children.
What if there was no way the authorities could get into the compound legally, but decided that they had to. What if there never was any call and this was a pretext to the raid?
Yeah, I know that sounds far fetched, but our authorities have been guity of a lot more than that.
The news service says that childrens services here in texas has taken all the children over 5 years from their mothers. They said it was easier to get the children to talk if the mother was not there.
Stupid people! Of course it is easier! You promise the kids they can go home if they talk and they say what children services wants to hear.
I know that sometimes children services is a good organization, but it is my opinion that they have a "holier than thou" attitude. The mothers not the children have any rights at all. Not while the children are under control of childrens services. All they can do is hope that the children are not coerced into saying something innocent that can be manipulated into something more siniister. I know, children services and all those authorities would never do anything like that. You kn9ow what though? They HAVE to find abuse. There is no choice. If they were to determine that there was no abuse indicated, then the whole state would be wide open for lawsuits and many of those "authority figures" will lose their jobs. We cannot let that happen.
Honestly, in all likelihood, there was probably abuse. That is my opinion, which seems to be the same as most people the the state of texas.
I differ though in how they did this. They had no proof of anything at all, but the children have been taken from their mothers. That is where my problem is. They did it upon a call from someone, and they had no proof. None. And now, even if those people are innocent, they will be found guilty.
Now, I believe that if any of them forced young girls into sex and marriage, they should be drug out in the streeet and shot. However, all I know is that they said a 16 year old girl called asking for help, saying these things. Maybe that is true, but they have not found the girl yet have they? In fact, they used this call to justify raiding the place of this sect and taking all the children.
What if there was no way the authorities could get into the compound legally, but decided that they had to. What if there never was any call and this was a pretext to the raid?
Yeah, I know that sounds far fetched, but our authorities have been guity of a lot more than that.
The news service says that childrens services here in texas has taken all the children over 5 years from their mothers. They said it was easier to get the children to talk if the mother was not there.
Stupid people! Of course it is easier! You promise the kids they can go home if they talk and they say what children services wants to hear.
I know that sometimes children services is a good organization, but it is my opinion that they have a "holier than thou" attitude. The mothers not the children have any rights at all. Not while the children are under control of childrens services. All they can do is hope that the children are not coerced into saying something innocent that can be manipulated into something more siniister. I know, children services and all those authorities would never do anything like that. You kn9ow what though? They HAVE to find abuse. There is no choice. If they were to determine that there was no abuse indicated, then the whole state would be wide open for lawsuits and many of those "authority figures" will lose their jobs. We cannot let that happen.
Honestly, in all likelihood, there was probably abuse. That is my opinion, which seems to be the same as most people the the state of texas.
I differ though in how they did this. They had no proof of anything at all, but the children have been taken from their mothers. That is where my problem is. They did it upon a call from someone, and they had no proof. None. And now, even if those people are innocent, they will be found guilty.
Saturday, March 29, 2008
FITNA
I have been waiting quite a while to see this video by Geert Wilders. Mostly because it caused so much commotion and threats. I react badly to threats myself.
Evidently, the service provider that was supposed to show it first canceled in the face of Islamic terrorism and intolerance for freedom. I finally got to see it though on LIVEFEED, before they took it off the net. It seems their people were getting death threats.
I watched it and found it interesting. Actually, it did not really show me anything I did not already know. I have read parts of the quran also, and have seen the same quotes that he used. What was different though, was the way they presented verses out of the quran, and then visually displayed the reality. It was not a pretty sight.
By seeing this video though, I realized I was not the only one to believe that islam is a threat to the rest of the world. I guess that makes me a hatemonger, but I am not cutting off heads. Also, I do not get enraged when someone misrepresents Christians or Jews. I just think of them as uninformed or simple minded. Here is a link to the video, but not sure how long it will be played there
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4vadl_fitna-the-movie-dutch-official-rele_news
Evidently, the service provider that was supposed to show it first canceled in the face of Islamic terrorism and intolerance for freedom. I finally got to see it though on LIVEFEED, before they took it off the net. It seems their people were getting death threats.
I watched it and found it interesting. Actually, it did not really show me anything I did not already know. I have read parts of the quran also, and have seen the same quotes that he used. What was different though, was the way they presented verses out of the quran, and then visually displayed the reality. It was not a pretty sight.
By seeing this video though, I realized I was not the only one to believe that islam is a threat to the rest of the world. I guess that makes me a hatemonger, but I am not cutting off heads. Also, I do not get enraged when someone misrepresents Christians or Jews. I just think of them as uninformed or simple minded. Here is a link to the video, but not sure how long it will be played there
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4vadl_fitna-the-movie-dutch-official-rele_news
Our Candidates?
Should Obama quit his church? That is funny. He has been influenced and following the guidance of this "mentor” minister for 20 years. His wife said she had never been proud of being an American until her husband was running for president. Osama’s' minister screams hate and anti-Americanism from his pulpit and that church supports Sharpton and Farrakhan and awarded Farrakhan a lifetime achievement award! For what, being a black Nazi? Obama says he never heard that or suspected any of this from his minister. However, his minister did not all of a sudden decide to say those things. It is pretty apparent that he has been spouting that for a long time. So, regardless of what Obama says, he is heavily influenced by his "mentor". On top of that, I recently heard on the radio of different organizations that he donated money to. Not a problem, except for one of them. He donated money to CAIR. CAIR is the Council on American and Islamic relations. It sounds fine on the surface, but many of their organizers and leaders have either been accused or convicted of having dealings with Hamas and Al Qaeda. Just yesterday, one of their leaders in Michigan (I think) was arrested for supporting terrorism.
Obama is either a fool or he believes the rest of us are.
Although he was not my choice as a presidential candidate, I thought he was a smart, nice guy. Evidently, that is wrong. Now, I am vehemently against Obama and what he really stands for. Obama had a chance to distance himself from this guy, but chose not to. He tried defending him and then made it sound like corporate America was to blame for all the problems. I am not a fan of corporations, they will make money off anyone, however, the problems that Obama and his ministers of racism espouse have nothing to do with corporate America. It is pretty clear to me that Obama and Clinton are very much alike. They will do anything to get what they want because they know they are right and are the "future" of the United States. Yeah, right!
Blacks can use the "n" word but I cannot. I am guilty of promoting slavery and intolerance because of something my ancestors "might" have done". I do not know if they owned slaves. I suspect not. By not jumping on the liberal bandwagon of presumed guilt means that I am guilty.
I try not to be insulting to people. I normally do not want to hurt anyone. However, I refuse to be forced into being politically correct, just because someone may take offense. Horse crap! If other people can say nigger, so can I. I have known niggers before. They can be white or black or any other color. They are judged by their words and actions, not by their race.
There is the black caucus, black college fund, Ms Black America, black history month...Lots of black only things going on. Where is the white caucus, the NAAWP, white college fund......... Oh yeah, they call those hate groups. Maybe we should ban all nonwhites from the Ms America pageant?
Rev Wright though can denigrate the white people, he can say that we made HIV in order to get rid of the blacks, he can say God damn America and tell us we are responsible for every major holocaust there has been.
Yeah we nuked Japan, they started the war. They should have stayed on their island. The Nazis murdered millions of Jews and Christians and anyone else they did not think "fit in"; but the blacks have had it so much worse. So they say. There is no mention of the fact that blacks were sold into slavery most times by their own people. Did the whites go to Africa round them up and make them slaves? No, that is not what happened. The Moors and their own people enslaved them and sold them for profit. That is how they got here.
That was very long ago. There are no black slaves here and there are no slave owners here. There has not been for many generations. The ones yelling about their bondage have no idea of what it is like. They have never been slaves, all they know is what they have read about or seen in movies. If they were interested, they would discover that slavery goes back a lot farther in time. Most peoples of the world were held in bondage at one time or another.
It is 3 am, the red phone rings and China is about to nuke us. Obama calls rev Wright, Sharpton, and Farrakhan for their opinion. Is this what anyone wants in our country? I do not believe that anyone wants these guys running around the White House and having influence. Anyone that uses any of these kinds of people as advisors should not be in any position of power. They should have some sense slapped into them. On the Obama web page they had an ad by the black panthers but removed it. I suppose that even though he is supported by them, he does not want people to give people the impression that he would accept them. Obama seems to be ashamed of his name. No one is allowed to mention his middle name. Hussein, hmmm, guess they thought that was too provocative.
To be fair about it, Clinton is no better. I always suspected she was the one running things when Bill was in office. If you look at the Clinton machine and their history, you will see that the Clintons will do whatever they want to get what they want. There is a very large list of people that suddenly died that were in the Clinton circle, or against them. No proof of anything, they are above suspicion, they do not care about anyone else. They know better than any of us. Didn't Bill spend two terms in office? He got kicked out. No one seems to remember that, no one seems to think that it is important.
After watching Clinton the last few months, you see that nothing about the Clinton machine has changed. Her blatant lie about Bosnia is an example of her opinions of the rest of us. Like Obama, she must believe that we are complete fools and she can say what she wants.
As far as Bill is concerned, he just runs around telling everyone how much good his wife will do for the country. Does everyone forget that he is a proven liar and that he was kicked out as president? And people flock to him and admire him. Maybe they are right. Maybe the majority of Americans are really that stupid. I sure hope not.
Now we get to McCain, he really is a hero in my book. I respect him for who he is and what he has gone through. However, there are a few things I do not like about him either. He supports NAFTA and GATT, he said he was in favor of a free trade agreement between the U.S. and Europe. In my estimation, those treaties are a crock and have done nothing except further American dependence on other countries. For some reason, I also think he may not be strong enough to do the job. I may be wrong, I hope so. Even though I do not believe in the effectiveness of McCain, I will vote for him. There seems to be no other choice.
None of the candidates want to talk about illegal immigration very much. I guess they can lose a lot of votes if they gave their opinion, even illegal votes. However, illegal immigration is very important to me and should be important to everyone. All three candidates are very wishy-washy about it right now.
Our candidates, not any good choices at all, and we will be stuck with one of them.
Obama is either a fool or he believes the rest of us are.
Although he was not my choice as a presidential candidate, I thought he was a smart, nice guy. Evidently, that is wrong. Now, I am vehemently against Obama and what he really stands for. Obama had a chance to distance himself from this guy, but chose not to. He tried defending him and then made it sound like corporate America was to blame for all the problems. I am not a fan of corporations, they will make money off anyone, however, the problems that Obama and his ministers of racism espouse have nothing to do with corporate America. It is pretty clear to me that Obama and Clinton are very much alike. They will do anything to get what they want because they know they are right and are the "future" of the United States. Yeah, right!
Blacks can use the "n" word but I cannot. I am guilty of promoting slavery and intolerance because of something my ancestors "might" have done". I do not know if they owned slaves. I suspect not. By not jumping on the liberal bandwagon of presumed guilt means that I am guilty.
I try not to be insulting to people. I normally do not want to hurt anyone. However, I refuse to be forced into being politically correct, just because someone may take offense. Horse crap! If other people can say nigger, so can I. I have known niggers before. They can be white or black or any other color. They are judged by their words and actions, not by their race.
There is the black caucus, black college fund, Ms Black America, black history month...Lots of black only things going on. Where is the white caucus, the NAAWP, white college fund......... Oh yeah, they call those hate groups. Maybe we should ban all nonwhites from the Ms America pageant?
Rev Wright though can denigrate the white people, he can say that we made HIV in order to get rid of the blacks, he can say God damn America and tell us we are responsible for every major holocaust there has been.
Yeah we nuked Japan, they started the war. They should have stayed on their island. The Nazis murdered millions of Jews and Christians and anyone else they did not think "fit in"; but the blacks have had it so much worse. So they say. There is no mention of the fact that blacks were sold into slavery most times by their own people. Did the whites go to Africa round them up and make them slaves? No, that is not what happened. The Moors and their own people enslaved them and sold them for profit. That is how they got here.
That was very long ago. There are no black slaves here and there are no slave owners here. There has not been for many generations. The ones yelling about their bondage have no idea of what it is like. They have never been slaves, all they know is what they have read about or seen in movies. If they were interested, they would discover that slavery goes back a lot farther in time. Most peoples of the world were held in bondage at one time or another.
It is 3 am, the red phone rings and China is about to nuke us. Obama calls rev Wright, Sharpton, and Farrakhan for their opinion. Is this what anyone wants in our country? I do not believe that anyone wants these guys running around the White House and having influence. Anyone that uses any of these kinds of people as advisors should not be in any position of power. They should have some sense slapped into them. On the Obama web page they had an ad by the black panthers but removed it. I suppose that even though he is supported by them, he does not want people to give people the impression that he would accept them. Obama seems to be ashamed of his name. No one is allowed to mention his middle name. Hussein, hmmm, guess they thought that was too provocative.
To be fair about it, Clinton is no better. I always suspected she was the one running things when Bill was in office. If you look at the Clinton machine and their history, you will see that the Clintons will do whatever they want to get what they want. There is a very large list of people that suddenly died that were in the Clinton circle, or against them. No proof of anything, they are above suspicion, they do not care about anyone else. They know better than any of us. Didn't Bill spend two terms in office? He got kicked out. No one seems to remember that, no one seems to think that it is important.
After watching Clinton the last few months, you see that nothing about the Clinton machine has changed. Her blatant lie about Bosnia is an example of her opinions of the rest of us. Like Obama, she must believe that we are complete fools and she can say what she wants.
As far as Bill is concerned, he just runs around telling everyone how much good his wife will do for the country. Does everyone forget that he is a proven liar and that he was kicked out as president? And people flock to him and admire him. Maybe they are right. Maybe the majority of Americans are really that stupid. I sure hope not.
Now we get to McCain, he really is a hero in my book. I respect him for who he is and what he has gone through. However, there are a few things I do not like about him either. He supports NAFTA and GATT, he said he was in favor of a free trade agreement between the U.S. and Europe. In my estimation, those treaties are a crock and have done nothing except further American dependence on other countries. For some reason, I also think he may not be strong enough to do the job. I may be wrong, I hope so. Even though I do not believe in the effectiveness of McCain, I will vote for him. There seems to be no other choice.
None of the candidates want to talk about illegal immigration very much. I guess they can lose a lot of votes if they gave their opinion, even illegal votes. However, illegal immigration is very important to me and should be important to everyone. All three candidates are very wishy-washy about it right now.
Our candidates, not any good choices at all, and we will be stuck with one of them.
Saturday, March 01, 2008
Clinton visiting us?
I just found out that hillary will be in Abilene, TX tomorrow. I would like it better if she went somewhere else instead of contaminating the soil of texas. I thought of going so I could boo her, but then, I do not care enough about her or her husband to bother with it.
Personally, I hope she beats obama. I think McCain would have an easier time of beating her than obama. There are too many people that believee obama is the greatest. I don't see why though. He has not done anything, he promises change, but no idea of what kind, he has no experience. In addition, his church displays some problems with their agenda. They push for black supremacy. I do have some reservations about his heritage, not because he is black, but because of his relationship with his fathers country. I figure they will end up with more of our money.
Why is it that the press does not ask hard questions of clinton and obama? Why would we want an ex-president that was kicked out of office, back in the White House? Do we trust the clintons any more? Hve they changed? I have always believed that Hillary wore the pants in the family back then. It is out in the open now.
That list of friends and associates of the clintons that show how many of them have died over the 20 years. It seems kind of odd when you look at the list. Good thing for me I am no friend or aquaintance of theirs.
I am going to vote for McCain. I am going to vote for him beause he may do less damage to the country than the others. Some of his ideas and policies I do not care for, the democrats the time around are so much worse.
Personally, I hope she beats obama. I think McCain would have an easier time of beating her than obama. There are too many people that believee obama is the greatest. I don't see why though. He has not done anything, he promises change, but no idea of what kind, he has no experience. In addition, his church displays some problems with their agenda. They push for black supremacy. I do have some reservations about his heritage, not because he is black, but because of his relationship with his fathers country. I figure they will end up with more of our money.
Why is it that the press does not ask hard questions of clinton and obama? Why would we want an ex-president that was kicked out of office, back in the White House? Do we trust the clintons any more? Hve they changed? I have always believed that Hillary wore the pants in the family back then. It is out in the open now.
That list of friends and associates of the clintons that show how many of them have died over the 20 years. It seems kind of odd when you look at the list. Good thing for me I am no friend or aquaintance of theirs.
I am going to vote for McCain. I am going to vote for him beause he may do less damage to the country than the others. Some of his ideas and policies I do not care for, the democrats the time around are so much worse.
Laugh or Cry, I Don't Know
I have been reluctant to post anything over the last month. If you watch the news you will see what I mean.
Lets see, there is a prisoner that claims his rights are being violated. Why? Because while in prison, he cannot get a sex change operation. he wants to be a she. He said that his breasts were disappearing and his genitals were working and he has reverted back to being male. LOL
Evidently, a judge has decided to consider whether the taxpayers should pay for his sex change. Since he is in prison it is his right?
That Peterson guy has demanded his guns back. I think I heard that he had 11 of them that had been confiscated by the police. He has had 4 wives. One is missing and two were murdered. But since they have not charged him, they have to give them back.
And congress. LOLOL They seem to spend more time worrying about drugs in sports and running the country. I have not figured out why they got their nose in it anyway. If illegal drugs are involved it should be a police problem. Not congress. What a bunch of silly baffoons. I think they are afraid to tackle real problems.
Lets see, there is a prisoner that claims his rights are being violated. Why? Because while in prison, he cannot get a sex change operation. he wants to be a she. He said that his breasts were disappearing and his genitals were working and he has reverted back to being male. LOL
Evidently, a judge has decided to consider whether the taxpayers should pay for his sex change. Since he is in prison it is his right?
That Peterson guy has demanded his guns back. I think I heard that he had 11 of them that had been confiscated by the police. He has had 4 wives. One is missing and two were murdered. But since they have not charged him, they have to give them back.
And congress. LOLOL They seem to spend more time worrying about drugs in sports and running the country. I have not figured out why they got their nose in it anyway. If illegal drugs are involved it should be a police problem. Not congress. What a bunch of silly baffoons. I think they are afraid to tackle real problems.
Friday, January 25, 2008
Political Debates
Political debates are a waste of time. I have been watching a few of them. No one, not the debators nor the media or any one else seems to want to ask the questions we want answered. What about secure borders, or illegal immegraiton? What about the two border agents that were railroaded into prison for doing their job? What about islam? When do they think the war on terror will end? What about companies outsourcing their customer service calls to India?....... What will they do to get the United States energy? Do they believe in the transamerica corridor, nafta, gatt? Come on! Ask some real questions, don't let them just trash each other out over nonsense. I do not like obama. He seems like a nice guy, but he has baggage I do not care for. Hilliary is so much worse. She is tougher than obama and was probably the one running things when bill was president. Trouble is, the clintons are crooked as hell. They care about no one except themselves. I do not like obama, but I curse the earth the clintons walk on. Our republican choices are pretty limited. The guys running there are just another group of graft collectors. We do not have any good choices, again. So, I guess I will be voting against someone, instead of voting for someone. That is a stinking way of doing it. When the democraps took over, they were promising all these changes for the better. They were going to cut pork. LOL, well, what they really meant was they were going to cut it into more equal shares. Although I will not like it, I predict that hilliary will get what she wants. The war will wind on and on, the economy will not get any better, more jobs will disappear, they will not fix the border problem, amnesty will be given, and sooner or later some idiot looking to be with allah will carry a dirty nuke into the country.
Islam
I have been a supporter of the Iraq war, with a few reservations. Way back during Desert Storm, I believe they call it the 100 hour war, saddams troops just disappeared. Everyone thought they had won. Anyone with any sense knew better than that. Then we stopped. At that time, we should have gone into Iraq and fixed it.When this war started in Iraq, after 911, I agreed that saddam needed removed. However, I did not like the way our leaders were going about this.It was apparent that they never learned a thing from Korea or VietNam, and all the other "police actions". They never had, nor do they now, have a clear concept of winning. How do they define win in relation to Iraq? They got rid of Saddam. Now though we are helping Iraq to emerge as a democratic country? That is what they said. Horsepucky! Islam and democracy and freedom do not mix. Will it be won after all the terrorists are gone? LOL That won't happen. There are too many wacko islamics out there in too many different countries. There is no way on earth to win that. What happens if one of them gets through the border with a dirty nuke? I know, our borders are all secure it could never happen. If one of them took out Houston, for example, how would we react? I am willing to bet that we would not react. Our "leaders" do not have the balls for a counter strike. It is a good thing I am not president. I would probably last maybe a week before I was assasinated. I would pull up a list of all foreign aid we distribute. That list would be cut down a whole lot. I would also remove our troops now from the middle east, so they would not be hurt in a future encounter. Then I would draw a line in the dirt.
Sunday, January 13, 2008
2nd Amendment Breakdown
The second Amendment is a short one, but it is absolutely essential.
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Many legal scholars and politicians disagree, however, I see this paragraph as covering different things. The is the well regulated militia which is necessary to the security of a free state. It also says to me that the right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.
I divide that for these reasons. If you like history, like I do, and you read a lot about our forefathers and our country, you will realize that what they intended is exactly what they wrote. Back during their time, everyone was armed. They were armed for protection from criminals, and from the English, and for food.
They warn us time and again about the government and the dangers of big government. Their are so many of them saying that government must be controlled. One way, is to insure that the citizens are armed.
Why would they take the guns? The only two groups of people using guns are criminals who do not care about law, and legal citizens. It would solve nothing except leave the criminals with the guns and make the citizen defenselss from the criminals and government.
I am getting older. I am almost 58. I refuse to give up any rights. When I went to war, they told me that it was for freedom and democracy. I will not give up any rights now just because some senile old man named lieberman or that broad collins wants to increase their "control".
Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Many legal scholars and politicians disagree, however, I see this paragraph as covering different things. The is the well regulated militia which is necessary to the security of a free state. It also says to me that the right of the people to keep and bear arms will not be infringed.
I divide that for these reasons. If you like history, like I do, and you read a lot about our forefathers and our country, you will realize that what they intended is exactly what they wrote. Back during their time, everyone was armed. They were armed for protection from criminals, and from the English, and for food.
They warn us time and again about the government and the dangers of big government. Their are so many of them saying that government must be controlled. One way, is to insure that the citizens are armed.
Why would they take the guns? The only two groups of people using guns are criminals who do not care about law, and legal citizens. It would solve nothing except leave the criminals with the guns and make the citizen defenselss from the criminals and government.
I am getting older. I am almost 58. I refuse to give up any rights. When I went to war, they told me that it was for freedom and democracy. I will not give up any rights now just because some senile old man named lieberman or that broad collins wants to increase their "control".
Thought Control Bill S.1959
I have been reading about S.1959, popularly known as the thought crime bill, but named by the submitters as the "Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act of 2007". From what I can see from the bill, I do not like it, nor do I believe it is constitutional. I also believe it is completely unAmerican. Anyone signing this bill or even not apposing it cares nothing about the citizens of the U.S. All you people in the government structure took an oath to defend the Constitution. I fully expect you to do so. Please protect my country. Please do not let the radicalized politicians that just want more power and countrol destroy America. Furthermore, I do not believe that the politically correct way of looking for radical muslims will ever work. No one wants to admit that the philosophy of islam and our way of life is not compatible in any way. There are no moderates.
Why would I throw that in there about muslims? If you look up Sen Joe Lieberman and Sen M. Collins you will see why. This bill was submitted by Collins, then it was sent onto Homeland Security Committee for evaluation. By the way, Lieberman and Collins are the two running the homeland security committee. So obviously, they will amend it to their wants, but they will approve and support it. Muslims come into it because on liebermans' web page he talks about "radicalized muslim terrorists", and how to find and stop them. So by the names they are using, it appears to me that they are using the terrorist problem as an excuse to control American citizens. This is their solution, however, any attack on the Constitution is an attack on all of us. This is definitely an attack on our constitution.
What can we do about this? Not a hell of a lot. I wrote Lieberman and Collins. They probably will not listen, because they know they are right and I am just a citizen. I also wrote my own congressman and senators about this.
If I read the ideas in S.1959 correctly, by emailing these people and telling them I do not approve or like it, then I am obviously a radicalized voter and should be watched. That is what they want. They want the power to watch and stop anyone that disagrees with the government. Hmmmmm, next month the Supreme Court decides whether the 2nd Amendment applies to the normal citizen or not. Here is what I am starting to think. They will decide that the 2nd amendment does not apply. At that point there will be a major push to disarm citizens. If you do not give them up, you go to jail? Possibly. After that, with unarmed citizens, they will be able to do what they want.
Paranoid? Conspiracy? Hey, just because I am paranoid does not mean they are not after me.
HA, HA
You know, our forefathers warned us about this very thing multiple times. But no one wants to believe it could happen.
Disgusting isn't it? They have all the money (trillions of dollars in debt but we still supply their pork), they have free lifetime healthcare for themselves, and now they want more control.
Khruschev many years ago said thet "they would bury us from within". He was wrong in one way. He had nothing to do with it. However, we are being buried from within by our elected party representatives.
Why would I throw that in there about muslims? If you look up Sen Joe Lieberman and Sen M. Collins you will see why. This bill was submitted by Collins, then it was sent onto Homeland Security Committee for evaluation. By the way, Lieberman and Collins are the two running the homeland security committee. So obviously, they will amend it to their wants, but they will approve and support it. Muslims come into it because on liebermans' web page he talks about "radicalized muslim terrorists", and how to find and stop them. So by the names they are using, it appears to me that they are using the terrorist problem as an excuse to control American citizens. This is their solution, however, any attack on the Constitution is an attack on all of us. This is definitely an attack on our constitution.
What can we do about this? Not a hell of a lot. I wrote Lieberman and Collins. They probably will not listen, because they know they are right and I am just a citizen. I also wrote my own congressman and senators about this.
If I read the ideas in S.1959 correctly, by emailing these people and telling them I do not approve or like it, then I am obviously a radicalized voter and should be watched. That is what they want. They want the power to watch and stop anyone that disagrees with the government. Hmmmmm, next month the Supreme Court decides whether the 2nd Amendment applies to the normal citizen or not. Here is what I am starting to think. They will decide that the 2nd amendment does not apply. At that point there will be a major push to disarm citizens. If you do not give them up, you go to jail? Possibly. After that, with unarmed citizens, they will be able to do what they want.
Paranoid? Conspiracy? Hey, just because I am paranoid does not mean they are not after me.
HA, HA
You know, our forefathers warned us about this very thing multiple times. But no one wants to believe it could happen.
Disgusting isn't it? They have all the money (trillions of dollars in debt but we still supply their pork), they have free lifetime healthcare for themselves, and now they want more control.
Khruschev many years ago said thet "they would bury us from within". He was wrong in one way. He had nothing to do with it. However, we are being buried from within by our elected party representatives.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
